The American metropolis has at all times been an emblem — of prosperity and alternative, of tradition and creativity, of segregation, gentrification, having and having not. Now, suffused with worry of a mortal hazard we will’t see and don’t absolutely perceive, our shining cities on a hill flash not a beacon however a warning gentle: hazard, don’t enter. Those that can afford to are getting out; some are vowing by no means to return.

As we crest the curve of the coronavirus pandemic (the primary curve, anyway), and put together to wade into the brand new regular, it’s our city hubs that stand to alter probably the most. What would possibly our cities appear to be in a post-COVID actuality? To discover the query, I talked to Binyamin Appelbaum, lead enterprise and economics author on the New York Instances editorial board, which final week revealed “The Cities We Want,” a sweeping examination and sharp indictment of urbanization over the previous half century.

“America’s cities have been as soon as engines of progress and alternative,” the piece proclaims in stark sort over an archive picture of the rising Manhattan skyline. “On this disaster, how can we save them?”

Right here is our dialog, edited for size and readability.

Why do you suppose it is very important write about cities now?

We launched into this broader venture financial inequality in American life. A part of our course of was to consider the place is that occuring, and what’s inflicting it? And a number of our discussions actually centered round geography — across the sense that it’s not simply that now we have financial inequality, however we actually have spatial separation of individuals main totally different financial lives, and that geographical segregation is a giant a part of the issue. Cities are the locations the place we see that almost all starkly — the place the very richest dwell aspect by aspect with the very poorest, in the identical metropolis however on the identical time in two totally different worlds.

Gary Hershorn by way of Getty Photos

The solar rises behind the Empire State Constructing and Hudson Yards in New York Metropolis on Could 14 as seen from Hoboken, New Jersey.

Is that this traditionally true of cities, or was there a time early on within the American metropolis when this wasn’t the case?

Cities have at all times attracted the wealthy and the poor. They’ve at all times had stark contrasts between wealth and poverty, actually all through human historical past. However in America, as not too long ago as 50, 60 years in the past, cities had fewer extremes of wealth and poverty, and the wealthy and the poor have been far more completely blended collectively.

Sure, there have been wealthy folks. Sure, there have been poor folks. However they typically lived in the identical neighborhoods and, to a larger extent than is now the case, made use of the identical public providers, the identical — what we describe as — infrastructure of alternative. The bodily divisions weren’t as stark as they’re now, and the inequalities weren’t as massive as they’re now, so on each of these dimensions, our cities have actually modified. The scale of the hole between the richest and the poorest has simply gotten rather a lot larger. And on the identical time, the wealthy have tended to more and more congregate collectively and to exclude the poor from the locations the place they dwell.

One thing that now we have seen time and again in This New World’s protection of the pandemic is the best way it lays naked and exacerbates current inequalities in society. It seems like inequality in cities was a subject you have been fascinated about pre-coronavirus. Did the best way the pandemic hit the U.S. change the best way you considered it?

It’s one factor to bear in mind that wealthy and poor People live these very totally different lives, and poor People are probably far more weak to one thing like a pandemic. After which it occurs, and also you’re watching as low-income People — who nonetheless have to go to work, and who’re susceptible to illness, and who are inclined to have a lot increased charges of the well being issues which are correlated with increased charges of fatalities from the coronavirus — you’re watching them die, mainly. You’re watching the poor die and the wealthy of their nation houses, and it added a way of urgency to the problems that already appeared vital however now appear much more so.

I wish to speak about density. The pandemic is simply crystallizing the notion of hotbeds like New York Metropolis as shut and soiled and dingy, and now havens for illness. However I feel density will get a nasty rap. Sure, city air pollution is a significant issue. However suburban sprawl is ruinous for the atmosphere. And now we’re watching households, fearing the virus, flee to the nation. What can we do if there’s an exodus of (principally prosperous) households from cities, transferring out of residences and into energy-inefficient, single-family houses on a few acres that infringe on pure habitats?

Cities are laborious, we should always begin by saying that. The economist Ed Glaeser has noticed that one cause folks in New York are usually proponents of extra authorities than folks in Montana is that they want the federal government extra. When individuals are dwelling collectively in shut proximity, it’s simply extra difficult. There’s a larger want for public providers, public infrastructure. It’s more durable to run a metropolis. 

However cities are additionally price it. Air pollution is extra of a problem in an city atmosphere, however within the combination, the extent of air pollution that all of us produce once we dwell collectively in density is way decrease than it might be if we lived all unfold out within the suburbs. So, it’s price it to run cities effectively. 

Cities are laborious … However cities are additionally price it.Binyamin Appelbaum

And now we have examples of cities which are being run effectively. Hong Kong, to take a notable instance, has had little or no occasion of the coronavirus, as a result of they’re successfully administering that metropolis. It’s denser than New York, however they’re doing an excellent job of working it, and because of this, they’re effective, and we’re not. Not as a result of we’re dense, however as a result of we’re not managing density. We’re not doing an excellent job of working our cities. 

One a part of the fact in America proper now is not only that the poor are remoted, however that they’re trapped within the locations that they’re from. The very thought of selecting up and going to the countryside, or transferring to a special place, is simply accessible to individuals who have that flexibility and that freedom — virtually by definition, they’ve wealth so as to have the ability to do this. And so what we’re actually speaking about [is]: The poor shall be within the cities; the query is, will others be there too? Or are we going to exacerbate the sorts of inequality that we’ve been speaking about? We have to enhance the functioning of our cities with a purpose to protect them, and with a purpose to understand all the advantages of city life.

Bruce Bennett by way of Getty Photos

An aerial view of the larger Boston space on June 4, 2013. The town correct is small in contrast with its surrounding suburbs.

I’m fascinated about these prosperous households leaving. In the event that they go for good, they’re going to be taking their tax and philanthropic {dollars} with them. How a lot does that harm the cities that they go away?

If we see that form of mass exodus, it might be very painful. Now we have a number of precedent for it: Wealthy folks have been transferring to the suburbs for a really very long time. 

I grew up exterior of Boston. Most residents of the Boston space dwell within the suburbs which are clustered round Boston itself. And people suburbs have deliberately resisted, over time, incorporation into town of Boston, as a result of the wealthier residents of these cities would reasonably maintain their cash to themselves. It is a very long-running downside. 

One of many basic challenges of municipal authorities in the USA is that the wealthy would reasonably dwell in enclaves and maintain their cash to themselves and limit the poor to areas the place they’re another person’s downside. And that’s actually unhealthy for cities. It’s actually unhealthy for cities in the event that they enter right into a cycle the place their lack of ability to supply providers causes folks with selections to depart and that makes it in flip even more durable to supply providers.

Let’s say a bunch of individuals do go away New York. May it truly make town extra inexpensive? 

Predicting the long run is inherently fraught. It’s definitely the case that, traditionally, now we have been by means of cycles during which cities have grow to be much less enticing to prosperous residents and that has opened up alternatives for different folks to occupy these areas. It’s undoubtedly the case that if fewer folks wish to dwell in cities, the price of dwelling in a metropolis will go down, and that has some advantages, probably. These are difficult dynamics. It’s not like every part is unhealthy, it’s not like every part is sweet. There will be silver linings in clouds, and at the least probably that may very well be one.

Workplace leasing in New York is down about 50%, and as corporations get extra used to distant work and employees begin demanding it, workplace area is simply going to proceed on a downward development. What does that do to a metropolis?

It’s good to be kind of skeptical concerning the diploma to which we’re going to see modifications as a consequence of this pandemic. As a result of the best way the world works is fairly sticky — it takes rather a lot to alter, and alter tends to return slowly. It’s undoubtedly the case that on numerous dimensions we’re seeing a shift away from central cities. That’s taking place with workplace area already, and it appears completely believable that we’ll see extra of it going ahead. I’d differentiate, nevertheless, between that development and the demise of New York or different city facilities.

There have been, for many years now, predictions that cities would grow to be much less vital as business facilities, that prosperity could be unfold extra evenly throughout the nation as a result of folks would have the ability to transfer to areas with a decrease price of dwelling and a better high quality of life. They stated this concerning the telegraph, they stated it concerning the phone, they stated it concerning the pc and the web. It’s a recurring chorus, and the information says that over that very same interval the alternative factor has occurred. Now we have solely positioned a larger significance on clustering collectively in a relative handful of city facilities which are extra economically vital than they’ve ever been earlier than. And so the concept this lastly will break that sample appears implausible to me on its face. 

Even when it have been the case that, economically, we put 5% much less significance on midtown Manhattan than we did earlier than the pandemic, that might nonetheless go away midtown Manhattan’s financial significance as an workplace heart at a better stage than at virtually another second in American historical past.

Mlenny by way of Getty Photos

A commuter prepare transferring on elevated tracks between buildings in Chicago. The New York Instances calls public transit “an infrastructure of alternative.”

Let’s speak about public transportation. Why is it vital? And what occurs to cities if public transportation infrastructure will get even worse than it has been? 

I fear about transit far more than I fear about downtown workplace markets. Public transit is a part of what we described in our articles as an infrastructure of alternative. It’s an egalitarian system that everybody can use. It makes it doable to journey cheaply and rapidly by means of city facilities. And that’s actually vital. It’s vital in the identical means that public colleges are vital — it ranges the enjoying area. It signifies that everybody can get throughout Manhattan on the identical pace, regardless of how a lot cash they’ve, for a similar low fare. And that issues rather a lot. 

A part of what makes cities nice and engines of alternative is that they’ve this egalitarian infrastructure. That infrastructure is crumbling and has been crumbling for a while, and it is extremely simple to think about the pandemic exacerbating that — each by decreasing, at the least within the close to time period, the quantity of people that wish to make use of these providers, and by additional straining the financial capability of cities to fund obligatory repairs in these providers. 

I feel the near-term outlook for public transportation is fairly grim. And the issue is that that builds on itself: In case you’re not sustaining now, then it solely turns into dearer to take care of an issue that builds up over time. I’m unsure what to do about it. However I feel the priority could be very actual.

What else do you are concerned about proper now, in our present scenario and searching into the post-COVID actuality?

We simply had the longest interval of uninterrupted progress in American historical past, and we utterly squandered it. We did virtually nothing to deal with the issues that plagued our society, to strengthen the inspiration of our economic system, or our society, or our democracy. On the contrary, we exacerbated lots of these issues. We made issues worse, although we had the chance to make issues higher. And now we discover ourselves once more in an hour of disaster, and people issues are solely larger and rising with time, and it’s now going to be even more durable to grapple with them.

We threw away the final decade and at the moment are confronted with even larger issues in an much more difficult atmosphere.Binyamin Appelbaum

We discover ourselves needing extra urgently than ever to deal with inequality, to deal with under-investment within the infrastructure of our society, to rectify the long-term sample of disinvestment in public training and in public transportation, in analysis and growth — all of this stuff that we did not do when occasions have been good are much more urgent now that occasions are unhealthy, however even more durable to take care of as a consequence. It simply feels tragic to me that we threw away the final decade and at the moment are confronted with even larger issues in an much more difficult atmosphere.

You talked about silver linings earlier. Is there one thing that you simply discover hopeful, that you simply’re hanging on to?

Right here’s the silver lining that I grasp on to: Disaster will be clarifying. I feel there’s a possibility to take inventory of what’s vital about cities. On this hour when cities aren’t working, when a lot of city life has been suspended, when the actual frailties in our system have been uncovered, there’s additionally a possibility to take inventory of what we’ve misplaced and to say, mainly, what is it that we worth about cities and the way can we get that again once more? What issues about cities is that they’re locations the place everybody can come and, collectively, work together, alternate concepts, pursue alternatives, create new issues. There’s simply no higher place to do this than in a metropolis.

For extra content material and to be a part of the “This New World” neighborhood, comply with our Fb web page.

HuffPost’s “This New World” collection is funded by Companions for a New Economic system and the Kendeda Fund. All content material is editorially impartial, with no affect or enter from the foundations. If in case you have an thought or tip for the editorial collection, ship an electronic mail to

A HuffPost Information To Coronavirus


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here